Why Embryo Donation and Not Embryo Adoption?Written by: Harold Eskin, Esq.
While the terms "Embryo Adoption" and "Embryo Donation" are often used interchangeably on the Internet, there are real differences between the two. This is not simply a case of splitting hairs; using the correct terminology has tremendous social, ethical and legal implications. Many businesses uses the term “Embryo Adoption” in their title and/or literature while other facilities, such as Embryo Donation International, have resisted the use of “Embryo Adoption.” The goal of this article is to explain why. Definitions: Adoption: The creation
of a parent-child relationship by judicial order between two parties
who usually are unrelated; the relation of parent and child created
by law between persons who are not in fact parent and child. This relationship
is brought about only after a determination that the child is an orphan
or has been abandoned, or that the parents’ parental rights have been
terminated by court order. (1) Donation: A voluntary
gift (as of money or service or ideas) made to some worthwhile cause.
Act of giving in common with other for a common purpose especially to
charity. The action of making a gratuitous gift or free contribution.
(2) Cryopreserved Embryos:
For purposes of this article, Cryopreserved Embryos (“embryos”)
are the product of a human egg and human sperm combined through the
process called In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) which are not transferred
to a woman’s uterus but are frozen in liquid nitrogen within six days
of fertilization. These embryos are the topic of this article. What Can Happen to the Cryopreserved Embryos? First, who owns these embryos? They
are not owned by the laboratory that put the eggs and sperm together.
The parents from whom the genetic material came from own them. Embryos
are currently treated as property in the legal system. The “parents”
of these embryos ultimately decide their outcome. These embryos are
most often used to have additional children but alternately may be destroyed
(not all facilities allow this option), donated to science (laboratory
work or human embryonic stem cell research) or given (donated) to needy
patients. Legality of Embryo Donation: Embryo donation is a common option
for owners of cryopreserved embryos. Laws regarding the legality of
donating embryos vary from state to state. Some states prohibit it,
some have no statutes addressing the issue and leave the issue to the
state courts (with various results) and a few states, such as Florida,
specifically allow for it. (6) Does Donation Mean Free or can the Donating Parents be Reimbursed? Of the few states that allow for embryo
donation, only some allow for reimbursement. Many states have laws against
paying those that donate their embryos. Florida, for example,
allows for the reimbursement of some of the expenses involved in the
creation of the embryos including, but not necessarily limited to, cryopreservation
fees. (6) It is important to understand that the simple act of appropriate
reimbursement doesn’t negate the concept of donation. Who Regulates Adoption and Embryos? Every state has an adoption statute and deal with changing or establishing parentage of an existing child. Adoptions can only be granted by the Court following the birth of a child. Whereas the medical process for Embryo Donation is regulated by the Food and Drug Administration, the legal procedure greatly varies from state to state and does not involve the courts but is managed through private contracts. (5) This is a significant legal difference between Embryo Adoption and Embryo Donation. What are the Implications of Using the Term Embryo Adoption? By using the term “Embryo Adoption”,
there is an attempt to afford full moral, ethical and, most importantly,
legal rights of personhood to the embryo itself. It is well known that
this country is divided with respect to the morality of abortion. If
the embryo were given full rights of personhood, this would inevitably
result in the outlawing of legal abortion. Another negative consequence of using the term "Embryo
Adoption" is in the rare event of lab accidents or when Embryo thawing
is unsuccessful and the Embryos cannot be recovered. If Embryos were
given the full rights of personhood, it is possible the embryologist
or IVF facility would be held accountable for manslaughter. There is
not a program in this country that could stay open with this type of
threat hanging over their heads. In yet another interesting twist, if
the embryos were given personhood and if one applied the thirteenth
Amendment abolishing slavery, ownership of an embryo could be prohibited.
Adoption implies personhood and personhood demands autonomy. While parents
have parental rights, they do not own their children. It is probable
that conferring personhood to embryos would result in tremendous problems
with the legal contracts involving Embryos. Contracts stating ownership
and transfer of the embryos could then be in clear violation of the
constitution. This would not be the case in an Embryo Donation. Embryo Adoption might also require
a home study, legal fees and judicial review that are not performed
with Embryo Donation. One could go through all of these steps and if
the Embryos didn’t implant, this would subject recipient parents to
unwarranted emotional and financial burdens. To further illustrate
the undesirability of using the term “Embryo Adoption,” the American
Society for Reproductive Medicine has stated that the term Embryo Adoption
is “deceptive.” Black’s Law Dictionary defines Embryo Adoption as slang. (1) Slang can be harmless and sometimes actually useful. In
this case, however, it is not a benign choice of words. By using the
term Embryo Adoption, there are a number of implications:
“Requiring infertile patients who need donor gametes or patients who
need donor embryos to suffer the imposition of unnecessary administrative
and legal trappings of adoption and the costs that accompany them is
not ethically justifiable. The donation of embryos for reproductive
purposes is fundamentally a medical procedure intended to result in
pregnancy and should be treated as such.” (3) As in many regular adoption agencies, Embryo Adoption agencies usually require payment of substantial fees by recipient parents of Embryos (“middle-man” or “finders” fees). Those entities who help arrange Embryo donations, such as Embryo Donation International, do not charge these types of fees. Who Screens the Recipients of the Embryos? Those favoring the use of Embryo Adoption feel that it is more appropriate to screen recipient parents by using
home studies, psychological screening in addition to medical testing.
Paradoxically, there is absolutely no screening done for couples that
conceive naturally. Trying to figure out who will make
good or poor parents is extraordinarily difficult. The mere fact that
recipient parents are going to great length to have a child immediately
places them in a category which is certainly more desirable than those
that conceive by accident. That is not to say that all infertility patients
will make great parents. It is to say that those that go to great lengths
to have and hold a child may be more likely to cherish their gifts. Physicians have been screening patients for sperm donation, egg donation and surrogacy for decades making certain that the procedure was medically indicated. Screening those accepting embryos should be no different. Embryo Donation must be medically indicated and only trained Reproductive Endocrinologists can ultimately make this decision about the medical appropriateness of this option. Thereafter, the appropriate legal paperwork (consents and contracts) would be utilized to complete the process. Can Embryo Donation Also Include Some of the Steps Commonly Reserved for Adoption? We here at Embryo Donation International
are examining this very option. We are proposing that donating parents
of embryos have three options:
The anonymous Embryo Donation is clearly
covered in the Florida statutes and should be the most common form of
Embryo Donation. Approved Embryo Donation would maintain anonymity while
providing the donor with a slightly increased level of screening of
the recipients. If the screening is too involved, however, the embryos
will not be chosen by any recipients. The third option of Open Embryo
Donation would require the donors and recipients to know whom each other
are and allow for the heightened level of screening of the recipients.
We expect that fewer donors and recipients may want to participate in
this open form of Embryo Donation but may make it available to those
that it desirable and/or necessary. It is possible that this last form of Embryo Donation may not be fully covered under the existing statutes so care must be taken when choosing this alternative. By offering these three options and
yet using the correct terminology, we do not open up the participants,
both donors and recipients, to the potential scrutiny of the courts
when the phrase “Embryo Adoption” is used. Summary: The embryo is due a greater level of
respect than other human tissues because of its potential to become
a person and because of its significant meaning for many people. However,
to describe an embryo as a person, which has not yet developed any features
we ascribe to personhood, is a dangerous decision. The slippery slope
of using the term Embryo Adoption is indeed quite steep and could have
ramifications well beyond the IVF world involving legal, ethical and
judicial implications. The term Embryo Donation is not only correct
but better protects recipient parents and those facilities that have
dedicated their lives to creating families. References: (1): Black’s Law Dictionary. 9th
ed. Weslaw, Eagen, MN, 2009. (2): http://www.websters-online-dictionary.org/definition/donation (3): ASRM Ethics Committee Report.
American Society for Reproductive Medicine: Defining Embryo Donation.
Fertility Sterility, 2009;92(6):1818-9. (4): Ethics Committee of the American
Society for Reproductive Medicine. The moral and legal status of the
preembryo. Fertil Steril 1994;62:32S-4S. (6): Florida Statute Section 742.14 Craig R. Sweet, M.D. 12611 World Plaza Lane, Building 53 E-Mail: Fertility@DreamABaby.com Harold S. Eskin, Esq. E-Mail: haleskin@legalsurrogacy.com
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This site complies with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information:
verify here.